The Harris adoption fiasco has bothered me since the news
first broke. I am appalled that this man
thinks himself too good to go through the proper channels and adopt children
that are a healthy match for his family.
This couple might have been fine adoptive parents to the right
kids. Instead they met a birthmother in
a parking lot, claimed religious discrimination when CPS told them that prayer
was not enough to help these girls, then allegedly held up the budget of the
entire agency until the placement was approved. What they failed to understand
is that waiting children do not only need to be adopted; they need to be
adopted by families who are appropriate for them and who are trained to deal
with complex trauma. Kids who have been
severely abused or neglected cannot be parented like typical children and they
deserve parents who have put in the time and effort to prepare for that.
The Harrises claim that they reached out for help after the
adoption and were not able to access the services their daughters needed. One of the girls had been diagnosed with
reactive attachment disorder, or RAD, and her behaviors were terrifying the
family. Children with RAD have typically experienced so much abuse or neglect
that they are unable to form healthy attachments. They can be extremely violent even at very
young ages. Often they become homicidal
or suicidal and everyone in the home is at risk of severe harm. Stories abound of children with RAD killing
pets, sexually abusing siblings, burning down homes with people inside, or
attempting suicide. Unfortunately, the
intense treatments that these kids need are few and far between and when a
parent is able to find a place that specializes in these kinds of issues,
Medicaid* often refuses to cover the cost.
Instead, children with RAD are bounced between inadequate providers or
sent home where they are a danger to their family and themselves.
Like many parents who are struggling with a child who has
RAD, the Harrises claim that they reached out to CPS because they did not know
what else to do with their children. They
say that they were told that if they relinquished their parental rights to their
children, they would be charged with child abandonment. The problem is that they were not given any
other options. While my personal opinion
of the Harrises is less generous, I truly believe that the majority of adoptive
parents who consider rehoming are not bad people who simply grew tired of the
children they adopted. Many of them are
good people who wanted to help kids and build their families but instead find themselves
in desperate situations with nowhere to turn.
I wrote recently
about my own experience with a therapist who assumed that I should “just
re-adopt out” my daughter because things were difficult. It was insulting because the suggestion meant
that he did not see my family as one worth preserving. I didn’t go in as someone who was scared for
her life or that of her other children.
I went to him as a grieving mother who was trying to make sense of a
devastating diagnosis. He made a
recommendation that he would never have made to a biological parent simply
because he placed a lower value on the relationship I have with my adopted daughter
than the one I have with my biological son.
That attitude is unacceptable but it is sadly prevalent among the people
that adoptive parents reach out to for support.
For example, when I interned at an inpatient psychiatric hospital, I saw
countless children and adolescents with very severe mental problems who were
moved to long-term residential treatment centers. The only time it was ever suggested that a
child be placed with a new family instead of receiving treatment was when someone
noticed the adoption box was checked in their chart.
The problem with rehoming, as it currently exists, is that
it fails both the children and the adoptive parents. Every time a child is placed with a new
family, they suffer a new loss and it becomes harder for them to trust that they
will ever be truly loved by anyone. In
addition, many of the kids who find themselves in new homes are later abused or
abandoned again. With no government or
agency oversight to make sure that the new homes are safe for these children, the
outcomes can be devastating.
That the problem of rehoming exist in the magnitude it does
is evidence that there is a problem with the child welfare system. When parents go through classes to
foster-adopt, we are promised help after the adoption. We are told that we can take in kids from
hard places because we will have access to all of the resources we need to
parent them. We are assured that if we
do what we are trained to do, the children will get better. Unfortunately those are often empty promises.
The problem with rehoming is that it allows CPS, adoption
agencies, and the professionals that we depend on to simply push our children
aside and blame the parents when there is fallout. The problem is that there is not an
acceptable alternative for situations where the child cannot safely remain with
their family. The problem is that there
are deeply wounded children who have been failed many times by the people who
were supposed to protect them and there is not an easy way to fix that. I don’t think that there are simple solutions
to this problem but I do think we have to start a conversation about real
alternatives. We have to put down our
torches so that we can see the hurting people who feel like they have no other
options. It’s not enough to be angry
about little girls being tossed between homes and given to a rapist, we have to
work to keep it from happening again.
I welcome your thoughts on how we can come together as a
community to help adoptive families who are struggling. Let’s continue this conversation on Facebook or in the
comments below.
*In most cases, children who are adopted from foster care
are able to keep Medicaid. This helps
people adopt who would not have been able to because of the high cost of
medical care.
No comments:
Post a Comment